Remove one hack caused by misunderstanding

No functional change

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joona Kiiski
2010-05-12 13:29:14 +03:00
committed by Marco Costalba
parent 02fe05cd0d
commit d72e862a5b

View File

@@ -804,8 +804,8 @@ namespace {
beta = *betaPtr;
isCheck = pos.is_check();
// Step 1. Initialize node and poll (omitted at root, but I can see no good reason for this, FIXME)
// Step 2. Check for aborted search (omitted at root, because we do not initialize root node)
// Step 1. Initialize node and poll (omitted at root, init_ss_array() has already initialized root node)
// Step 2. Check for aborted search (omitted at root)
// Step 3. Mate distance pruning (omitted at root)
// Step 4. Transposition table lookup (omitted at root)
@@ -813,8 +813,6 @@ namespace {
// At root we do this only to get reference value for child nodes
if (!isCheck)
ss[0].eval = evaluate(pos, ei, 0);
else
ss[0].eval = VALUE_NONE; // HACK because we do not initialize root node
// Step 6. Razoring (omitted at root)
// Step 7. Static null move pruning (omitted at root)