HCha/Stockfish
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/HChaZZY/Stockfish.git synced 2025-12-19 16:46:30 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Pick best moves one per cycle instead of sorting

Browse Source 
When the move list is very small, like captures normally
are, it is faster to pick the best move with a linear
scan, one per cycle.

This has the added advantage that the picked capture move is
very possibly a cut-off move, so that other searches are
avoided. For non-captures it is still faster to sort in
advance.

Because scan-and-pick alghortim is not stable, node count
has changed.

After 885 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +196 =510 -179 50.96%  451.0/885

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marco Costalba
2009-10-20 11:38:20 +01:00
parent 51c3af9dd0
commit cf4df0327a
2 changed files with 33 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
src/movepick.cpp
View File

@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ void MovePicker::go_next_phase() {
case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES:
lastMove = generate_captures(pos, moves);
score_captures();
sort_moves(moves, lastMove);
return;
case PH_KILLERS:
@@ -141,20 +140,17 @@ void MovePicker::go_next_phase() {
// to get SEE move ordering.
curMove = badCaptures;
lastMove = lastBadCapture;
sort_moves(badCaptures, lastMove);
return;
case PH_EVASIONS:
assert(pos.is_check());
lastMove = generate_evasions(pos, moves, pinned);
score_evasions();
sort_moves(moves, lastMove);
return;
case PH_QCAPTURES:
lastMove = generate_captures(pos, moves);
score_captures();
sort_moves(moves, lastMove);
return;
case PH_QCHECKS:
@@ -267,17 +263,17 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() {
{
while (curMove != lastMove)
{
move = (curMove++)->move;
switch (phase) {
case PH_TT_MOVES:
move = (curMove++)->move;
if ( move != MOVE_NONE
&& move_is_legal(pos, move, pinned))
return move;
break;
case PH_GOOD_CAPTURES:
move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move;
if ( move != ttMoves[0].move
&& move != ttMoves[1].move
&& pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned))
@@ -297,6 +293,7 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() {
break;
case PH_KILLERS:
move = (curMove++)->move;
if ( move != MOVE_NONE
&& move != ttMoves[0].move
&& move != ttMoves[1].move
@@ -306,6 +303,7 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() {
break;
case PH_NONCAPTURES:
move = (curMove++)->move;
if ( move != ttMoves[0].move
&& move != ttMoves[1].move
&& move != killers[0].move
@@ -316,11 +314,18 @@ Move MovePicker::get_next_move() {
case PH_EVASIONS:
case PH_BAD_CAPTURES:
move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move;
return move;
case PH_QCAPTURES:
move = pick_best(curMove++, lastMove).move;
if ( move != ttMoves[0].move
&& pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned))
return move;
break;
case PH_QCHECKS:
// Maybe postpone the legality check until after futility pruning?
move = (curMove++)->move;
if ( move != ttMoves[0].move
&& pos.pl_move_is_legal(move, pinned))
return move;