HCha/Stockfish
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/HChaZZY/Stockfish.git synced 2025-12-20 00:56:39 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

No need to test for MOVE_NONE before move_is_ok()

Browse Source 
Function move_is_ok() already catches the move == MOVE_NONE case.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marco Costalba
2011-09-25 16:28:38 +01:00
parent 6bc16f3ff1
commit 63a04134d0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/search.cpp
View File

@@ -1549,8 +1549,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
Piece p1, p2;
Square ksq;
assert(m1 && move_is_ok(m1));
assert(m2 && move_is_ok(m2));
assert(move_is_ok(m1));
assert(move_is_ok(m2));
// Case 1: The moving piece is the same in both moves
f2 = move_from(m2);
@@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
bool connected_threat(const Position& pos, Move m, Move threat) {
assert(move_is_ok(m));
assert(threat && move_is_ok(threat));
assert(move_is_ok(threat));
assert(!pos.move_is_capture_or_promotion(m));
assert(!pos.move_is_passed_pawn_push(m));