HCha/Stockfish
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/HChaZZY/Stockfish.git synced 2025-12-18 08:07:08 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix brekage from previous patches

Browse Source 
It is interesting the fact that we need to test for
move_is_castle(m) anyway and not relying on testing
if destination square is attacked. Indeed the latter
condition fails if the castling rook is attacked,
castling is coded as "king captures the rook" but it
is legal in that case.

Verified no functional change with beginning of the series.

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marco Costalba
2011-05-18 06:46:08 +01:00
parent 89a06f6651
commit 5b7a141065
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
src/position.cpp
View File

@@ -603,9 +603,10 @@ bool Position::pl_move_is_legal(Move m, Bitboard pinned) const {
assert(piece_on(king_square(us)) == make_piece(us, KING));
// If the moving piece is a king, check whether the destination
// square is attacked by the opponent.
// square is attacked by the opponent. Castling moves are checked
// for legality during move generation.
if (type_of_piece_on(from) == KING)
return !(attackers_to(move_to(m)) & pieces_of_color(opposite_color(us)));
return move_is_castle(m) || !(attackers_to(move_to(m)) & pieces_of_color(opposite_color(us)));
// A non-king move is legal if and only if it is not pinned or it
// is moving along the ray towards or away from the king.