mirror of
https://github.com/HChaZZY/Stockfish.git
synced 2025-12-22 18:17:02 +08:00
Improve grammar of comments
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4801 No functional change
This commit is contained in:
@@ -102,8 +102,9 @@ std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const Position& pos) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Marcel van Kervinck's cuckoo algorithm for fast detection of "upcoming repetition"
|
||||
// situations. Description of the algorithm in the following paper:
|
||||
// Implements Marcel van Kervinck's cuckoo algorithm to detect repetition of positions
|
||||
// for 3-fold repetition draws. The algorithm uses two hash tables with Zobrist hashes to
|
||||
// allow fast detection of recurring positions. For details see:
|
||||
// http://web.archive.org/web/20201107002606/https://marcelk.net/2013-04-06/paper/upcoming-rep-v2.pdf
|
||||
|
||||
// First and second hash functions for indexing the cuckoo tables
|
||||
@@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ bool Position::legal(Move m) const {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Position::pseudo_legal() takes a random move and tests whether the move is
|
||||
/// pseudo legal. It is used to validate moves from TT that can be corrupted
|
||||
/// pseudo-legal. It is used to validate moves from TT that can be corrupted
|
||||
/// due to SMP concurrent access or hash position key aliasing.
|
||||
|
||||
bool Position::pseudo_legal(const Move m) const {
|
||||
@@ -565,7 +566,7 @@ bool Position::pseudo_legal(const Move m) const {
|
||||
return checkers() ? MoveList< EVASIONS>(*this).contains(m)
|
||||
: MoveList<NON_EVASIONS>(*this).contains(m);
|
||||
|
||||
// Is not a promotion, so promotion piece must be empty
|
||||
// Is not a promotion, so the promotion piece must be empty
|
||||
assert(promotion_type(m) - KNIGHT == NO_PIECE_TYPE);
|
||||
|
||||
// If the 'from' square is not occupied by a piece belonging to the side to
|
||||
@@ -603,7 +604,7 @@ bool Position::pseudo_legal(const Move m) const {
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (type_of(pc) != KING)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Double check? In this case a king move is required
|
||||
// Double check? In this case, a king move is required
|
||||
if (more_than_one(checkers()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -611,7 +612,7 @@ bool Position::pseudo_legal(const Move m) const {
|
||||
if (!(between_bb(square<KING>(us), lsb(checkers())) & to))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// In case of king moves under check we have to remove king so as to catch
|
||||
// In case of king moves under check we have to remove the king so as to catch
|
||||
// invalid moves like b1a1 when opposite queen is on c1.
|
||||
else if (attackers_to(to, pieces() ^ from) & pieces(~us))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@@ -1134,7 +1135,7 @@ bool Position::see_ge(Move m, Bitboard& occupied, Value threshold) const {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
else // KING
|
||||
// If we "capture" with the king but opponent still has attackers,
|
||||
// If we "capture" with the king but the opponent still has attackers,
|
||||
// reverse the result.
|
||||
return (attackers & ~pieces(stm)) ? res ^ 1 : res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1265,7 +1266,7 @@ void Position::flip() {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Position::pos_is_ok() performs some consistency checks for the
|
||||
/// position object and raises an asserts if something wrong is detected.
|
||||
/// position object and raise an assert if something wrong is detected.
|
||||
/// This is meant to be helpful when debugging.
|
||||
|
||||
bool Position::pos_is_ok() const {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user