Use 128 bit multiply for TT index

Remove super cluster stuff from TT and just use a 128 bit multiply.

STC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee719b3aae8aec816ab7548
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 12736 W: 2502 L: 2333 D: 7901
Ptnml(0-2): 191, 1452, 2944, 1559, 222

LTC https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee732d1aae8aec816ab7556
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 27584 W: 3431 L: 3350 D: 20803
Ptnml(0-2): 173, 2500, 8400, 2511, 208

Scheme back to being derived from https://lemire.me/blog/2016/06/27/a-fast-alternative-to-the-modulo-reduction/

Also the default optimized version of the index calculation now uses fewer instructions.
https://godbolt.org/z/Tktxbv
Might benefit from mulx (requires -mbmi2)

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2744

bench: 4320954
This commit is contained in:
mstembera
2020-06-14 23:35:07 -07:00
committed by Joost VandeVondele
parent 995ee4b311
commit 1ea488d34c
5 changed files with 22 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ namespace {
// search to overwrite a previous full search TT value, so we use a different
// position key in case of an excluded move.
excludedMove = ss->excludedMove;
posKey = pos.key() ^ Key(excludedMove << 16); // Isn't a very good hash
posKey = pos.key() ^ (Key(excludedMove) << 48); // Isn't a very good hash
tte = TT.probe(posKey, ttHit);
ttValue = ttHit ? value_from_tt(tte->value(), ss->ply, pos.rule50_count()) : VALUE_NONE;
ttMove = rootNode ? thisThread->rootMoves[thisThread->pvIdx].pv[0]